Illiquid assets

Illiquid assets · room 03 of 13

India, worked in full.

7 minute read

One illiquid asset class taken to the bottom on one jurisdiction, from the entry instrument to the certificate that releases the last tranche. Thirteen rooms stand open in this family, and the discipline they run on does not change when the asset class does.

01 · The position

Where the work sits

Distance is the structural problem, and the rest follows from it.

An investment committee in one country, an entity chain in another, a register in a third language and a delivery machine on the ground: the architecture has to carry all four, and it has to carry them for a decade. Structuring discipline, governance a committee can defend and control that does not dilute with distance are the things a structure can be built to hold. They are the whole subject of this reading.

We are appointed by the manager, and by no one else, for the life of the mandate. The chain that keeps that true is set out at Independence.

02 · The structural questions

Settled at entry

Five structural questions. Settled before anyone is appointed to answer them.

The delivery mechanism

Delivery runs on an authority somebody has to hold.

Brief, team, cost, programme, contract and completion each sit under a named authority. Which authority, held by whom, and answerable to which document, is a structural choice taken at entry. We design it. The party the manager appoints holds it.

The verification cycle

Every drawdown turns on a test written years earlier.

What evidence releases a drawdown, on what cycle, tested by whom, and what happens when the evidence does not arrive: those are terms of the instrument, not habits of a site visit. We specify the cycle and the test. An appointed party runs it and answers for it.

The land test

Land, read properly.

Before capital stands on it, the position clears a fixed documentary threshold of six heads: chain, records, possession, consents, charges and disputes, with the defects named in writing before commitment.

03 · Sectors

Where structure decides the outcome

Three sectors, each with a different binding constraint.

Sector

Commercial. The exit specification is written into the entry.

Where the eventual buyer underwrites the file as well as the building, the specification, the certifications and the evidence behind them are structural terms rather than finishes, and they have to be fixed before the appraisal is built on them.

Sector

Residential and township. Assembly precedes construction.

Where the position has to be aggregated before it can be built, the entity chain carries an assembly problem and a construction problem at once, and the phase map that answers one of them is rarely the map that answers the other.

04 · India

The entry conditions

Full foreign ownership, automatic route. Conditions decide everything after.

Construction development in India carries one hundred per cent foreign investment without an approval committee. The structural work is in the conditions attached to it, because each one is a term of the way out: a lock-in that runs per tranche, an exit gated on completion as the municipality defines it, and a prohibition on land trading that sits one drafting error away from most structures.

The rulebook is treated as part of the site. Structured on day one, diarised for the life of the scheme, evidenced when the exit comes.

05 · The instrument

Inside Mobilise

Eight capital decisions between a thesis and money coming home.

The firm's method runs in six moves: define, map, design, compare, stress-test, mobilise. On a development asset the last of the six unfolds into eight capital decisions, each closed by a named deliverable, from entry structuring to the memorandum that evidences the exit conditions item by item. The eight are the delivery sequence for this asset class. The six are the method underneath every asset class.

The Eight Gates

  1. 01Entrythe thesis becomes a structure
  2. 02Controla shortlist becomes a held position
  3. 03Proofdiligence, reconciled and monetised
  4. 04Underwritingthe appraisal, stressed against the proof
  5. 05Sanctionthe approvals programme run as critical path
  6. 06Commitmentprice fixed where design is finished
  7. 07Deliverymonthly verification, certified drawdown
  8. 08Exitthe conditions evidenced, item by item

A gate is a decision with a deliverable, and the deliverable is what an investment committee reads three years later.

06 · What is published

The readings

Read the work, not an account of it.

Four readings stand in the open, each taken to the point where it binds: where structures break, what a transaction can be built out of, which steps cannot be taken a second time, and the questions the published instruments leave unsettled.

Failure points

Fifteen places a structure breaks.

Each entry names the assumption underneath it, the instrument that creates the constraint, the stage at which it usually surfaces, what it costs to find it there, and the question that would have caught it first.

Structures

Eleven readings on how a transaction is built.

The vehicle, the chain beneath it, the financing, the security, the way out and the economics. Each reading takes one structural question and follows it to the point at which it binds.

Open questions

Five questions the instruments do not settle.

What the texts do and do not say, what turns on the answer commercially, the position taken in the meantime, and what would close it. Dated, because they are expected to move.

07 · Thirteen rooms

The rooms

Thirteen pages, each naming the one beside it.

No gate stands here: the family is published whole. Two rooms state the asset class without a jurisdiction under it, and eleven work one jurisdiction to the bottom. Enter anywhere. Every reading names the room beside it, and every reading ends by naming the next.

Two rooms sit outside this family and are read beside it: Independence, which sets out the chain that keeps one duty of care intact, and Our views, which is expected to move.

We are an independent specialist transaction-architecture firm. The investment decision is taken by the manager before we are engaged; what we design is the architecture through which it can be implemented, and the parties the manager appoints operate it.

Disclosures

The company
Bayswater Transflow is the trading name of Bayswater Transflow Engineering Ltd, a private limited company registered in England and Wales, company number 16277213, registered office 128 City Road, London, EC1V 2NX. A Modern Slavery Statement is registered with the UK Home Office registry.
Regulated status
The firm is not authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority, and nothing here is offered as a regulated service. Where a transaction needs work that only an authorised or licensed party may do, that work belongs to a party the manager appoints, in that party's own name and under its own permissions.
Information only
Nothing on this website is an offer, a recommendation, or a view on the merits of any investment. It is not legal, tax, regulatory, accounting or investment advice, and it creates no client, advisory or fiduciary relationship. Engagements exist only under their own written terms.
Promotion
To the extent that any content of this site is an invitation or inducement to engage in investment activity within the meaning of section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, it is directed only at persons within the exempt categories stated on the legal page, and it must not be acted on or relied on by any other person. It is not directed at retail clients.
Readings
Where a published instrument is read here, the reading is the firm's own,. Instruments change.
Correspondence
patrimony@bayswatertransflow.com is the one electronic address, for every subject on the legal page, and the registered office is the correspondence address.

Stated · The terms of access, the data-protection position and the registered particulars in full are on the legal page.