The corridor · The diaspora
The diaspora rulebook.
Much of the Gulf's wealth holds Indian identity, and Indian law treats that identity as a different legal position, not a sentiment. This page states the position precisely: what may be acquired, how the money must move, how it comes home, and the development exemption that changes the arithmetic. Precision here is not pedantry. It is the difference between an exit that clears and a file your bank cannot pass.
01 · The position
A different legal position
You are not a foreign buyer here. The rules say so in terms.
A non-resident Indian or an overseas citizen of India may acquire immovable property in India directly, other than agricultural land, a farm house or plantation property, which may be inherited but not bought. A person resident outside India who is neither may not, save in narrow cases. That is not a concession extended to the diaspora. It is a different legal position, written into the exchange-control rules, and much of the Gulf's wealth holds it without ever having read it.
Reading it matters, because the position carries its own mechanics. The channel the purchase money uses, the account it sits in, the door the proceeds later leave through: each is prescribed, each is checkable, and each is decided earlier than most families realise. The rest of this page is those mechanics, in the order money meets them.
02 · Money in
The entry channel is evidence
The exit is written at the entry.
Consideration for Indian property must move through prescribed channels: inward remittance through banking channels, or funds held in the non-resident accounts the law recognises. The rules say the rest expressly: no traveller's cheques, no currency notes, no other mode. Every acquisition and transfer runs through banking channels in India, with applicable taxes paid.
This is not a formality, and treating it as one is the corridor's most expensive habit. The payment channel is the evidentiary basis of the repatriation right: when your bank tests a remittance of sale proceeds years from now, what it examines is how the acquisition was funded. A purchase funded the wrong way does not merely breach the rules. It quietly reclassifies which exit door the proceeds may use, and nobody mentions it until the day the money wants to leave. Monitoring the funding channel from the first tranche is a service, not a compliance chore, and it is one we perform.
- The repatriable accounts
The external rupee account and the foreign-currency deposit account: freely repatriable, and the funding sources that keep a later exit on the widest door. Interest on the external account is exempt from Indian income tax, which is stated in the banking directions themselves.
- The ordinary account
The rupee account for Indian-sourced funds. Genuinely useful, and structurally different: property funded from it exits through a capped window rather than the open door. Families discover this distinction late. We put it in the file early.
- One correction worth carrying
The remittance scheme most often cited in corridor conversations is an outbound channel for residents of India, capped per financial year. It is not how Gulf capital enters India, and hearing it offered as the route tells you the speaker has not read the rules.
03 · Money out
A test, not a promise
Repatriation is a test your bank applies at the end, and it is decided at the beginning.
- Sale proceeds, the open door
Proceeds repatriate where the property was lawfully acquired and the acquisition was funded in foreign exchange through banking channels or from the repatriable accounts. Where a purchase ran on a housing loan, repayments made from abroad or from those accounts count as foreign-exchange funding. The conditions are cumulative, and the bank checks all of them.
- The two-property convention, precisely
The famous cap applies to residential property: repatriation of sale proceeds is restricted to not more than two such properties. The restriction is written for the residential case, which is exactly the kind of precision worth knowing before a portfolio is structured around a half-remembered rule.
- The capped window
Property funded from the ordinary account, and assets received by inheritance or legacy, exit through a defined annual window per financial year, run through one bank, on documentary evidence and an undertaking, with anything beyond it needing the regulator's prior approval. Workable, and entirely procedural: the file decides the speed.
- The inheritance surprise
Property inherited from a person resident in India does not sit on the same repatriation footing as property purchased from abroad. It routes through the capped window, not the open door. This is the single most common structural surprise in Gulf family holdings, and it is discoverable years in advance by reading the file.
- Current income, the uncapped channel
Rent, dividends and interest repatriate as current income, freely, with tax deducted or provided for. An income asset and a trading asset do not have the same exit mechanics, and families are usually told this too late. It changes what you build, and it changes how we structure what you hold.
04 · The development exemption
Shorter, not short
The lock-in does not apply to you. The other conditions still do.
Foreign investment into Indian construction development carries a three-year lock-in, counted per tranche. The Rules then say, in terms, that the lock-in condition shall not apply to investment by NRIs or OCIs. It is written, it is unamended, and it materially changes the arithmetic of a development entry for the diaspora investor.
What the exemption does not do is dissolve the rest of the regime. The exit still runs through completion or trunk infrastructure as the municipality determines them. Only developed plots may be sold as land. Pricing discipline still governs what a non-resident may pay and receive. Each phase remains a separate project. The exemption removes one condition, not the framework, and the difference is worth understanding precisely before it is relied on. Understood precisely, it is a genuine advantage: the diaspora investor holds development exposure with a freedom of timing the rest of the world's capital is denied.
05 · The prohibitions that protect
Bright lines, useful ones
Some of the rules exist to tell you who you are dealing with.
- 01 The assured-exit ban Indian foreign-exchange law does not permit anyone to offer a non-resident an exit at an assured price. If you are being offered one, you have learned something about the counterparty rather than about the asset. We treat that sentence as a screening instrument, and so should you.
- 02 The land-trading bar Dealing in land for profit is closed to foreign capital, and development is expressly outside that definition. The distinction is statutory, and it is the reason this practice exists in the lawful form it does: develop, or hold for income. Never trade the ground.
- 03 The agricultural bright line Agricultural land, farm houses and plantations may be inherited but not purchased. Any structure offered to you that softens that line is a structure offered against the rules, and it will eventually be priced accordingly, by a bank, a buyer or a court.
- 04 The channel discipline Every rupee in and out moves through banking channels, taxed and recorded. The rules leave no cash lane, and the counterparties who suggest otherwise are volunteering for your refusal list.
06 · The record we keep
Not advice. The file.
Your advisers take the positions. We make the record support them.
Nothing on this page is advice on your facts, and the rules themselves assign the decisions elsewhere: your bank applies the repatriation test, your tax advisers own the tax position, the regulator owns the channel. What a development manager owns is the record those parties will one day examine: the funding channel of every tranche evidenced from day one, the acquisition documents built for the exit door they must eventually use, the account architecture mapped and minuted, and income assets kept distinct from trading assets in the file as well as in the intention.
Done from the first rupee, this is bookkeeping. Reconstructed a decade later, across banks and generations, it is archaeology at legal rates. We do it from the first rupee.
Enquiries
The practice answers.
128 City Road, London, EC1V 2NX
The development practice is led by Tanishq Chauhan. Correspondence reaches the principal directly.
Tanishq Chauhan on LinkedIn, opens in a new tab
Or continue with